1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Naked Teenagers - Art?

Discussion in 'Alley of Dangerous Angles' started by Aikanaro, May 31, 2008.

  1. T2Bruno

    T2Bruno The only source of knowledge is experience Distinguished Member ★ SPS Account Holder Adored Veteran New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!)

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,776
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    440
    Gender:
    Male
    I would tend to agree with Merlanni, The Magister, and Decados -- but then artists also need to eat. Art for art's sake is a great concept (which is true for greats works in museums), but an art exhibit in a small gallery has only one goal -- to make money. Galleries are in the business to sell pictures and paintings. Museums are in the business to share culture. A gallery can also share culture and art -- but it's main thrust is selling.

    Keep the great works in the museums. But ban the exploitation of children by modern "artists."
     
  2. NOG (No Other Gods)

    NOG (No Other Gods) Going to church doesn't make you a Christian

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,883
    Media:
    8
    Likes Received:
    148
    Gender:
    Male
    Ilmater:
    Ah, well, I wouldn't classify that as a biological solution so much as a social one, but yes, that would work nicely. Good luck, though.

    Decados:
    The difference here is who would be deprived of proper use. Many,many people use alcohol on a semi-regular basis, and most of them do it properly. Very few of them go out driving drunk or end up beating their wives and very few of them end up being alcoholics. Complete prohibition of alcohol would deprive these people of the legitimate use of alcohol to protect a few.

    On the other hand, very few people legitimately use pictures of nude children. I would guess there are a few artists out there who legitimately wish do express something using them, but that's probably it. I'd guess there are several hundred to several thousand times the number of pedophiles out there. To deprive a very few of legitimate use to prevent a great many more abusing such things is reasonable.

    As a whole, I have no problem with saying the natural human body is a beautiful thing, even in a non-sexual context, but I think there are safer (for society as a whole) ways to express that than using pictures of nude children.
     
  3. Aldeth the Foppish Idiot

    Aldeth the Foppish Idiot Armed with My Mallet O' Thinking Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,434
    Media:
    46
    Likes Received:
    250
    Gender:
    Male
    I... um... Not really sure how to say this... Oh, the heck with it! I agree with NOG. :eek: Wait until they are 18 and are consenting adults and then do it. I can see very little artistic value in photographing nude minors. Wasn't there another flap recently about some child star (Hannah Montana maybe?) being photographed nude and having the pictures show up in a magazine with just a sheet covering certain parts of her?
     
  4. LKD Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    6,284
    Likes Received:
    271
    Gender:
    Male
    I have to say I agree with the above -- and I'll add that IMHO pictures of nude children belong only in medical textbooks for the rarified purpose of illustrating obscure skin conditions. I can think of no other reason I would consider valid for the use of nude teenage pictures. Wait until they are 18 and capable of forming consent on their own before you take nude photos of them for any purpose other than medical.

    I really, really hate pretentious artists doing stuff like this and then calling it "art" and implying that the rest of us great unwashed fools are too unrefined to understand their genius. I don't know if the artists should necessarily face charges but his work should be destroyed and a firm warning extended that this kind of "art" is not acceptable in our society.

    As for Miley Cyrus, she wasn't nude as she was covered -- I wouldn't want my daughters in those poses, mind, but the incident was blown way out of proportion. Her previous image being subverted was what was at the heart of the matter, and as I think has been said before by others the poses with her father were more disturbing.
     
  5. Morgoroth

    Morgoroth Just because I happen to have tentacles, it doesn'

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,392
    Likes Received:
    45
    Very interesting topic this one. There was a case in Finland a month back where an artist made an artpiece where she put naked pictures of teenagers together as criticism towards child pornography. She claimed to have found those through a simple internet search. Of course the artpiece was confiscated along with her computer harddrive and she was found guilty of a couple of charges but given no further punishment. Can't say I disagree with the sentence. If you want to make some sort of artistic statement use adult actors that are supposed to represent teenagers it might not have the same "punch" but art really is no more of a valid reason for using underaged naked models than other commercial purposes.
     
  6. The Great Snook Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,123
    Media:
    28
    Likes Received:
    313
    Gender:
    Male
    Without seeing the pictures, I'm not sure it is fair to pass judgement. The closest I have found to a picture is the background shot in this article

    It isn't a clear enough picture for me to judge if it is porn or if it is art. That will always be the question and I don't believe any two people will have the same standard.

    EDIT: Actually, that picture may not be from this exhibit.
     
  7. Splunge

    Splunge Bhaal’s financial advisor Adored Veteran Pillars of Eternity SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!)

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Messages:
    6,815
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    336
    So it's from your private collection? :p

    Anyway, I agree with NOG's analysis of the alcohol vs nude pictures scenario. Which just goes further to convince me that my earlier position is appropriate.
     
  8. The Great Snook Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,123
    Media:
    28
    Likes Received:
    313
    Gender:
    Male
    The missus tends to be pretty liberal, but I think she will draw the line at naked teenage girls in the house. At least until Little Snook is a few years older, and then she will be handing out condoms and forcing me to have "the talk".
     
  9. Trellheim Gems: 22/31
    Latest gem: Sphene


    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,469
    Media:
    5
    Likes Received:
    23
    My :2c:
    Sculpture of a naked Roman emperor = Art.
    Live naked artist expressing the isolation and fake politeness of todays people by dancing and making stupid faces while being silently observed by a bunch of people holding wine glasses and wearing stupid clothing = The kind of art I don't want to understand, but whatever, let them have their fun.
    Pictures of naked teenagers = Not art. It's about what it leads to.
     
  10. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Personally, I think we are asking the wrong question. The question isn't whether the work was or wasn't art. Since at least some people (ie the artist, the parents, the teenage kids who posed) feel it was art, the short answer to that question is yes, absolutely, these are works of art. Whether or not these works are truly works of art is, however, completely irrelevant. If we all agreed that the work was art, would that vindicate it? While art is meant to be subversive and to challenge our sensibilities (and this work does an admirable job of both), artists do go too far once in a while. We shouldn't be asking whether or not the work qualifies as "art". We should be asking if the work goes too far. I think it does.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2008
  11. Gnarfflinger

    Gnarfflinger Wiseguy in Training

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    5,423
    Likes Received:
    30
    So you're classifying it offensive art. That works.
     
  12. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes and no. Lots of art is offensive...and there is nothing wrong with producing offensive art. The problem in this case is that the artist may well have exploited minors in a misguided attempt at making some sort of statement. That is where I think the artist went too far.
     
  13. Stu Gems: 20/31
    Latest gem: Garnet


    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,206
    Likes Received:
    5
    Porn is made by pornographers, I don't feel this is the case in this situation - Bill Henson is a well established and well regarded artist trying to create what is in his, and many other peoples eyes, art. In terms of overstepping normal social boundries, well yes, but I think that was part of the point. The over-politicisation of the issue is imho rediculous - surely the fate of work is better decided by the art world, the child/parents and the law rather than every populist politician and his dog.

    I can't say I'm too interested in seeing the work, nor that I condone it, but I'm not a particularly huge fan of censoring, especially in light of all the greats works that have been banned at different times thoughout the ages. I think there are also more serious issues in the sexualisation of the young in popular media rather than in art circles.

    At the end of the day no ones getting abused, someone gets to express themselves and make the statement they want, and chances are only a handful of people in art circles will view it, and they'll likely view it as intended. Rich, artistically inclined people are buying his work, not seedy backstreet child-abusers. I don't want to have a government that censors art and stifles creative freedom just because of social norms.
     
  14. LKD Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    6,284
    Likes Received:
    271
    Gender:
    Male
    I would argue that most societal norms take precedence over pretentious "art". Also, perversion is not a trait only possessed by the lower class -- plenty of "rich, artistically inclined people" are perverts too. I concede that the artist's intent may be pure, but he made a mistake here, IMHO, and I don't think perversion should hide behind a shield of "artistic expression."
     
  15. Drew

    Drew Arrogant, contemptible, and obnoxious Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,605
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    The fact that these works challenge societal standards of decency is not the problem. If the work is perverted (it could be tasteful), that isn't the problem, either. Challenging societal standards or being perverted is not illegal, and shouldn't be. The problem is one of exploitation. While whether or not the works in question were exploitive in this particular case may be a somewhat nebulous issue, these kids are minors. Where minors are concerned, we should always err on the side of caution.
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2008
  16. Aikanaro Gems: 31/31
    Latest gem: Rogue Stone


    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    5,521
    Likes Received:
    20
    Fortunately, the law is far more supportative of free speech and art than most people: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/06/06/2267360.htm?section=australia

    One of the pictures is included, with nipples censored because y'know, nipples are horribly, horribly offensive.

    I'm actually quite surprised by this outcome - was pretty sure the artist was headed for a good long time in jail. I'm also kinda underwhelmed by the picture, but I guess not all art has to be especially interesting or good...
     
  17. Morgoroth

    Morgoroth Just because I happen to have tentacles, it doesn'

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,392
    Likes Received:
    45
    Considering that the prime minister has spoken out about the case so strongly that law might be about to change soon enough though.
     
  18. Stu Gems: 20/31
    Latest gem: Garnet


    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,206
    Likes Received:
    5
    "I also said, when it comes to the independent processes of the law, they are completely separate from what any individual or politician may think, feel or respond to by way of their own individual judgments." - Kevin Rudd

    Hopefully he sticks to his statement, it was a good outcome for free speech imho
     
  19. Sir Fink Gems: 13/31
    Latest gem: Ziose


    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    576
    Likes Received:
    4
    The sad fact is that there are perverts out there who will get turned on by a photo of a dirty toilet. There are folks who will masturbate to pictures of a tree. Does that make such pictures porn?

    If you look at, say, the Miley Cyrus picture and get turned on sexually, who's to blame? The photographer or you? Can artists control how their art is interpreted? Charles Manson claimed to have been inspired by the Beatles' White Album. Should be ban the album?

    There's a classic old joke that illustrates my point perfectly:

    A man goes to a psychotherapist for analysis. The doctor shows him a series of Rorschach ink blots and asks the patient to describe what they look like. He sees nude women in all of them. The doctor replies "I am ready to make my diagnosis: you sir have a dirty mind!" "Me?" asks the patient, "you're the one drawing all the dirty pictures!"
     
  20. Déise

    Déise Both happy and miserable, without the happy part!

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    30
    As distasteful as I find them, the pictures do certainly appear to have been produced as works of art rather than as pornagraphy. I would, however, question how the law can be applied going forward. Are the police expected to have to rebut the defence of a child pornagrapher that their works are produced as art and not as porn? It would be very easy to cater for a market at the blurring of the two lines, although graphic images would obviously be in violation. A blanket ban on such imagery of minors would be much easier to enforce. I can't see this as being too great an infringement of free speech, after all there are hardly any great benefits to society by allowing such images.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.