child pornography

Remove all ads!

@Matthew G.: That feeling like vomitting was actually real. It was so disgusting even though I've seen my part and I'm not a saint myself. Nothing to do with releasing the tention by beating the perverts though. I've been utterly hated for my self-control, really. No matter how they try they can't make me lose my temper and that's what they hate. Although I'm very short with people molesting others I've hardly if ever needed to use physical force against one.

I vote for compulsory treatment for ANY case of pedophilia. By pedophilia I understand the younger one being less than 15 and less than 18 if the older one seduced her/him. If the age difference is not significant it's not pedophilia of course. Infertilisation if intercourse confirmed (prevention), castration for rapists limited to disabling erection, done to all rapists since all are perverts, seduction counting as rape if the younger is a female below 15.

 

Not really if just over the net. If 'enviromental' yes. He however should be able to prove that if this is a 'normal' research. If it's all about his possibly being abused years ago, what for nude children pics?

 

Well Matthew G. is right, should you kill the thief, then kill the person who makes the item stolen, or other potential thieves? Then if so, not only are you killing the person who has done a crime, you are killing someone who is doing their job, or is completely innocent.

 

where is Laches when you need him?

 

As I always say, judge deeds, not persons. Hate the sin, love the sinner. However, too much mercy for the wolf is crudelity towards the sheep. Sheer violence is not a method still.

 

First of all,Phedofiles or not creeps. Yhey ar sick, just like homosexuals and necrofiliacs and the more.

Then there is the question: What is child pornography ?
A picture of a naked 3 year old girl playing in a swiming pool in tha backyard? Most people say: No that is not.

A picture of a naked 3 year old girl geting ****ed by her daddy? Everybody agrees that that is a clear yes, I think..

A picture of a naked 3 year old girl lyimg on her bed with her legs spread?:Some say yes some say no

So that is the big "grey" area, and I must say that I have noting against it, although I think it is pretty sick. But what now if the girl is 14? I would think that could be nice, but according to the law it is still child pornography...

I guess that the rules about child pornography must be changed before you can say it is good or not...

 

dmc: true enough, there are many who withstand their desires. My point is that the desire is there and that it is strong (and getting stronger).

chevalier des Trois-Tours: I wasn't doubting your vomit feeling.
As for castration- cruel, but reasonable in such circumstances.

Another matter would be preventing future generations from becoming pedophiles. However severe the judge or the law may be, it will not keep the feeling, or "disease", from reappearing.
We need a good solution to the problem. Any suggestions?

p.s. Question: is there treatment for pedo's? I heard something about that.
p.s.s. a little off the topic: what does IMO stand for?

 

IMO--> In My Opinion

 

@Matthew G.: I know you weren't doubting. It's just that that was nothing to do with lynching people.

Treatment is for all perverts. Homosexuals divide into perverts and not-really perverts. Some of the latter are incurable. But it's still sickness, not another option as most of people in media say or the official line claims.

I'd still insist on some division between those who just enjoy young female partners and pedos. Say what you like, it's natural that the female is the younger.

30 year old man + 22 year old girl is more natural than 30/31 and possibly non-pervert.

I believe 30/18 is pervish, but still more natural than 30/31.

But 30/16 => the guy in most cases pervert (if not both) and 30/15 => real pervert.

Exception: At best and hardly ever, if emotional ties are very strong (some Mr&Miss Right), the female is mature over her age mentally & spiritually (prerequisite) and maybe biologically/physiologically (half-justifiable) and
[(were she not that)=>(he wouldn't 'pick' her)] =>slight pervert, not a 'real' one. Everyone has something favourite. Of course if those conditions are met, sex is not the basis of that relationship. It can and should wait. If the guy understands that without external help, he's probably just very much non-standard in preferences and not that much sick.

30/<15 => animal. 20 suffices for him to be so, exc. certain climates where they become mature sooner.

Sorry for brackets and logical operators, but I think it's better than possible misunderstanding and subsequent explanations.

Edit: homo pedophiles = animals.

child porn perverts = compulsory treatment needed

teen porn - depends on age, mostly perverts to be treated

[ January 17, 2003, 15:50: Message edited by: chevalier des Trois-Tours ]