1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots and access many other features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this distinction is truly tangible and valued by our members. We'd love to have you join us today!

(If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.)

Regrettable flaws

Discussion in 'Icewind Dale 2' started by Edmond Dantes, Sep 27, 2007.

  1. Edmond Dantes Gems: 3/31
    Latest gem: Lynx Eye


    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    1
    Raptor,

    More hack and slash is fine if that's what they intented.
    My point is the game feels rushed because of the linearity.
    I'm just saying with the experience the developers had of this type of game, that the whole game feels as if they had to compromise on lots of stuff, you know?
    Battles are fun ; linear areas, linear subquests are a little less fun.
    What's odd it that the game is actually much more varied in terms of quest handling in the opening chapter (more use of dialogue skills, many suquests, etc...) than the rest of the game.
    It is a good game however, I would rate it 8/10.
    With just a little more polishing, it would have been a grandiose game.
     
  2. raptor Gems: 16/31
    Latest gem: Shandon


    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2005
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    1
    Linearity is actually seen as a good thing in certain ways/players, especially the dreaded mainstream, I recal reading somewhere that the developers of Icewind dale 1 was aiming IWD more toward the "diablo fans" persons than the heavy RPG fans. Think of it as an alternative game/style/type.

    Also it is quite common for games that are more linear buildt to have more developed "rpg" aspect at the start of the game, than at the end (Just look at Temple of Elemental Evil for example, heck even Baldurs Gate 2 gets alot less "rpg" once you start going for the story line).

    I think the problem here is that if they did "polish" up, I don't think you would have noticed any difference on the areas you mentioned. Becose the game was more or less intended as "it is" in that regard.

    Not disagreeing though, I would have absolutelly *loved* annother game in Baldurs Gate 1 style with lots of exploration, and just running around experiencing the world etc. And I do think the story in IWD2 is a bit dull, especially compared to IWD1 (That I feel had better story than even the BG games at times). But if they spendt more time on the game, I doubt it would be the story they fixed, probablly they would have tweaked the combats even more.
     
Sorcerer's Place is a project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of our time and funds on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!

Sorcerers.net is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on amazon.com, amazon.ca and amazon.co.uk. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.